iconcharts

AndroidTM Benchmarks

Performance Comparison of Android Devices

Vivo 1916

General information and performance details for Vivo 1916 can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest Mobile benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the device compared to 10 other common devices in terms of PassMark Android CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph lists up to the last 5 baseline submissions for this particular device.
Vivo 1916

Model Variants: vivo 1916

CPU Type: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc TRINKET

Number of Cores: NA

Total RAM: 3200.5 MB

Average CPU Mark: 2,580

Average Mem Mark: 13,997

Average Disk Mark: 13,988

Average 2D Mark: 23,965

Average 3D Mark: 13,632

Average CPU Mark (V3): 13,867*

Average PassMark Rating
5,512

Rank: 1910
Samples: 7

First Benchmarked in V3/V10:
Jul 30 2020

CPU Mark Comparison
As of 17th of November 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Device Average CPU Mark
UMIDIGI G9 5G
4,695
Ulefone Armor 27 Pro
3,780
Blackview Tab 13 Pro
3,304
ZIOVO Z128_EEA
3,142
TECNO KL6
3,107
UMIDIGI TG4FBG9TA
2,940
Vivo 1916
2,580
Ulefone Armor Pad
2,004
Dell Inc. Latitude E7450
1,962
Revoview A56
541


Last 5 Baselines for Vivo 1916
Most recent listed first
Android Device PassMark
BL8060708 - Apr 17 2023
6227
BL8039483 - May 05 2022
6449
BL8009291 - May 19 2021
5049
BL8009290 - May 19 2021
5049
BL811803 - Oct 03 2020 [OLD V3]
5267