iconcharts

AndroidTM Benchmarks

Performance Comparison of Android Devices

Vivo 1935

General information and performance details for Vivo 1935 can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest Mobile benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the device compared to 10 other common devices in terms of PassMark Android CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph lists up to the last 5 baseline submissions for this particular device.
Vivo 1935

Model Variants: vivo 1935

CPU Type: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc TRINKET

Number of Cores: NA

Total RAM: 7608.2 MB

Average CPU Mark: 2,299

Average Mem Mark: 12,778

Average Disk Mark: 9,390

Average 2D Mark: 14,628

Average 3D Mark: 14,755

Average CPU Mark (V3): 13,359*

Average PassMark Rating
4,978

Rank: 2130
Samples: 6

First Benchmarked in V3/V10:
Sep 29 2020

CPU Mark Comparison
As of 17th of November 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Device Average CPU Mark
UMIDIGI G9 5G
4,695
Ulefone Armor 27 Pro
3,780
Blackview Tab 13 Pro
3,304
ZIOVO Z128_EEA
3,142
TECNO KL6
3,107
UMIDIGI TG4FBG9TA
2,940
Vivo 1935
2,299
Ulefone Armor Pad
2,004
Dell Inc. Latitude E7450
1,962
Revoview A56
541


Last 5 Baselines for Vivo 1935
Most recent listed first
Android Device PassMark
BL8063916 - Jun 14 2023
5125
BL8047965 - Sep 05 2022
4591
BL8040928 - May 22 2022
6358
BL8016071 - Aug 14 2021
3819
BL8002884 - Mar 03 2021
4813